(Woman) — Rachel Burns almost dropped a coffee cup when her husband told her about the Supreme Court’s June 27 ruling to effectively maintain a Texas reproductive medicine clinic that offers abortions. ..
Burns, 33, a resident of Lost Creek, West Virginia, said Youth Defender, A non-profit organization based in Washington, DC. Due to the strict regulations of her state, Burns traveled to Maryland for her procedure, where she felt her choices were respected.
When I contacted him by phone, Burns’ voice was quivering happily. “Storytelling is really the future of abortion rights and shows people how we women know what we want to do,” Burns said. She “knew what was best for her family.”
Burns participated in a torrent of delightful reactions to the news that the High Court voted 5 to 3 in one of the court’s most important abortion cases in 20 years.
The Supreme Court on Monday delivered another good news to the women’s rights community. 6-2 decision not to facilitate gun access to people convicted of domestic violence..
Twice the dose of good news for women from the Supreme Court!
TX abortion restrictions have been discontinued
Valid grounds for domestic violence in gun refusal
— S Dynarski (@dynarski) June 27, 2016
Whole Woman Health v. In a ruling against Hellerstedt’s Texas Abortion Act HB2, judges lifted restrictions on Texas abortion clinics and doctors, which had already closed half of the 40 clinics operating throughout the state in 2013. Did. Supported, the number was expected to drop to around 10.
The Supreme Court will revoke the regulations of the Texas Abortion Clinic. https://t.co/1ruNBzkbSw
— Associated Press (@AP) June 27, 2016
The Abortion Prohibition LawFighted former Texas State Senator Wendy Davis three years ago in an 11-hour filibuster, which caught the public’s attention after Davis succeeded in delaying the passage of the bill. On Monday, Davis was delighted.
— Wendy Davis (@wendydavis) June 27, 2016
The law, which was finally passed, required abortion physicians to obtain hospitalization privileges in hospitals within 30 miles and required clinics to meet the building codes of outpatient surgery centers.
By threatening women’s access to abortion, restrictions have tested the strength of women’s constitutional rights to abortion. Judge Stephen Breyer said these provisions “I imposed an excessive burden [and] It has created an unforgivable disorder that applies to all women seeking an abortion. “
The judgment is 26 other statesFive of them are as strict as Texas.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton welcomed the ruling in Cincinnati, Ohio, and Senator Elizabeth Warren attended the campaign rally for the first time.
This battle is not over: the next president must protect the health of women. A woman is not “punished” for exercising her basic rights. -H
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 27, 2016
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, one of the legal abortion providers, expressed his joy and determination.
— Planned parent-child relationship (@PPact) June 27, 2016
Others have pointed out the work that remains in many states to restore access to abortion that has been lacking in the last two decades.
“The battle to protect access to abortion is not over,” said Dr. Willy Parker. Doctor for reproductive health, A national advocate said in a press statement. “We ensure that physicians fulfill their deep and sincere commitment to provide dignified, compassionate, and appropriate assisted reproductive technology to all women in need of it, both in Texas and across the country. I will continue to fight so that I can. “
The ruling also sparked a wave of negative reactions, including Senator Marco Rubio, a former Republican presidential candidate in Florida.
I was very disappointed today #SCOTUS Texas Abortion Clinic Decision. I will continue to fight for my life and protect my unborn baby.
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) June 27, 2016
Texas Senator John Cornyn said New York Times “Today’s decision is a step towards protecting the well-being of mothers. [the] state. “